February 02, 2006
Straight Eye for a Queer Role?
I've seen this item several times around the blogosphere, and I don't know what to say.
I have a lot of respect for actors, only because the good ones can take on different roles and play them all to (almost) perfection. I mean, hello? Tom Hanks?
But does Pitt feel that his popularity is waning that much? Is this a new trend, some sort of "gay bandwagon?"
Well, I guess, in Pitt's case, it fits. He's with the "hot chick" of the moment, and now he wants the "hot role" of the moment. But wait, what was Troy????
h/t: The Superficial
Show Comments »
And 'Interview with a Vampire'...and 'Meet Joe Black'...and 'Fight Club'....
Posted by: Sadie at February 2, 2006 12:39 PMWhat's next? Pitt and Clooney makin' sweet man love in Ocean's 13???
Oh Brad! Oh George!!
Posted by: GroovyVic at February 2, 2006 06:53 PMReading this post immediately reminded me of the following from "Life of Brian" (Source: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Monty_Python's_Life_of_Brian)
Francis: Why are you always on about women, Stan?
Stan: I want to be one.
Reg, Francis: What?
Stan: I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me "Loretta".
Reg: Wha'?
Stan: It's my right as a man.
Judith: Well,why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?
Stan: I want to have babies.
Reg: You want to have babies?!
Stan: It's every man's right to have babies if he wants them.
Reg: But... you can't have babies.
Stan: Don't you oppress me!
Reg: I'm not oppressing you, Stan, you haven't got a womb! Where's the fetus gonna gestate? You gonna keep it in a box?
[Stan/Loretta starts to cry.]
Judith: Here! I-I've got an idea. Suppose that you agree that he can't actually have babies, not having a womb — which is nobody's fault, not even the Romans' — but that he can have the right to have babies.